Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Guide to a Perfect Offshore Outsourcing Vendor Deal

Cost-cutting: Beleaguered companies see it as the only sure action in an uncertain world. They think that if they cut costs beyond the bone, surely profits will seep from the wound.

During times of economic turmoil, when the pressure to cut costs is most intense, many companies turn to offshore outsourcing. They see it is a quick way to reduce IT and other back-office expenses.

Under financial strain, however, companies-even those that are experienced with offshore outsourcing-make knee-jerk decisions, and in their haste, they fail to consider provisions in outsourcing contracts that would protect their staff, give them more control over the staff the outsourcing company allocates to their projects, or safeguard their intellectual property. The outsourcing deals they ink end up doing much more harm to their bottom lines than good.

Richard Green, partner at law firm Robinson & Cole LLP, spent a good part of the previous recession as an in-house lawyer with a business process outsourcing (BPO) provider, where he witnessed first-hand the bad contract negotiation decisions clients made under cost and time pressure.

He says customers made concessions on operating level agreements (OLAs) and service level agreements (SLAs) after only a round or two of negotiations.

"If an issue [with an SLA or OLA] wasn't going to save the customer money in the short term or speed up deal closing, we on the supplier side needed only to dig in [our heels] for a bit to get our way," says Green.

Green cites the offshore outsourcing engagement Lehman Brothers entered into in 2002 with Spectramind (now owned by Wipro) to have the Indian company manage its internal help desk as an example of a deal that a customer didn't give due consideration.

"The function Lehman outsourced was universally viewed as too complex and immature within Lehman's own organization to be a good candidate for outsourcing," says Green. "Yet, driven by dollar signs, Lehman did it anyway with disastrous results. The performance and the feedback from internal company customers was so terrible they shut it down a few months later." Lehman had to bring help desk management back in house.

Conseco had a similar experience when it outsourced a contact center to India in 2001, says Green. Customers were so up in arms over the move that Conseco brought the contact center back to the US in 2003, he says.

Lehman's and Conseco's experiences make it clear that the biggest offshoring mistake companies can make in this environment is moving too quickly. Besides proceeding too fast, companies should make sure they avoid the following eight pitfalls that thwart companies' best efforts to save money through offshore outsourcing.

1. Don't let offshore outsourcing vendors pad contracts with initial set-up fees.

Vendors realize that most outsourcing deals are price-driven. Therefore, some take dubious measures to ensure that they are the lowest bidder. Their low bids are often an illusion because they add costs elsewhere to make the deal more profitable for themselves in the end.

"This practice has been perfected to an art by some offshore vendors," says Anupam Govil, chairman of the Global Sourcing Forum + Expo, a trade show focused exclusively on outsourcing. Consequently, he adds, customers are often struck with a "nasty surprise" when unreasonably high set-up fees suddenly appear in the final contract.

To avoid such surprises, Govil recommends that customers ask prospective offshoring partners for fully loaded cost estimates. This way, when prospective buyers match quotes from different outsourcing companies, they can make apples to apples comparisons, he says.

2. Don't give more work to your outsourcing provider just because of a pre-existing contract.

Robinson & Cole's Green sees many companies pile work on an existing offshore outsourcing partner for convenience's sake.

"The thinking has been, 'Well, we already successfully outsource function X to supplier A, why not just throw another statement of work on supplier A's master agreement and outsource functions Y and Z too,' " he says.

That's a mistake because your existing outsourcing partner may not be the best vendor for those new functions, says Green. Your vendor might not offer the best price for those functions, or they might not have the expertise or experience managing those functions. What's more, the new functions you're thinking of outsourcing might not even lend themselves to offshore outsourcing.

Before you fork over new work to your outsourcing provider, consider if the work is best suited to your vendor.

3. Don't lose control of change management.

Diana J.P. McKenzie, partner and chair of information technology law at Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, sees too many companies treat outsourcing deals as static.

"All of these deals will change over the time," she says. "This is the nature of IT."

McKenzie advises offshore outsourcing customers to make sure their contracts include a process for handling changes to the contract as business conditions necessitate. (See also How to Renegotiate an Outsourcing Contract.

4. Don't depend on a foreign judicial system for relief.

When disputes between a customer and offshore outsourcing partner arise (as they often do when deals are rushed), customers can't depend on a foreign judicial system, particularly in India, to help settle the dispute.

"In India, it can take longer to get something through the court system than it does to raise a child," says McKenzie. "A contract must have an arbitration provision to have any hope of getting a timely resolution. Better yet, insist contract disputes be resolved in the USA."

5. Don't fail to validate the credentials of the outsourcing staff.

Unfortunately, it's not uncommon for staff at offshore outsourcing firms to fake their professional and educational credentials-and for their employers to let them get away with it.

"In India, one can easily obtain credentials through a variety of means, such as fake mailing addresses and fake phone numbers," says Mike Drips, a Microsoft SharePoint consultant who has worked on multi-million dollar projects for a variety of Fortune 500 companies including American Express, Verizon, Microsoft and GE.

If your offshore provider's staff isn't above board, you can't expect to get quality service, so make sure to perform background checks on staff.

6. Don't let your staff burn out.

In the heat of contract negotiations, it can be easy to forget certain provisions that will keep your staff sane, such as having your offshore vendor tailor its work hours to yours so that your staff doesn't have to work through multiple time zones.

"You are paying them money, so you should not be getting up at 3 AM for a conference call," says Drips. "The vendor's staff should be getting up [early or staying up late] to talk to you."

Another way to lower your and your staff's frustration is by adding a clause that demands English speakers, recommends Drips. English-speaking contacts may not automatically be provided to you if you have not added this provision to the contract, even if the overall outsourced function requires English-speaking roles.

7. Don't accept your domestic project manager's recommendations without evaluating the details of the deal yourself.

Offshore outsourcing providers will sometimes try to influence deals by wooing project managers with exotic trips and gifts, says Drips.

"Be wary if your domestic project manager suddenly has the funds to go on a three week visit to the country that your offshore vendor is located in," warns Drips.

Because enticement is not uncommon, scrutinizing deals yourself is critical. Also essential: Double checking all staff recommendations to ensure their opinions haven't been unduly swayed. If you don't vet your staff's recommendations or review outsourcing deals on your own, you risk entering into a disadvantageous contract.

8. Don't get caught in a data security trap.

Many outsourcing deals stipulate that the client is responsible for data security and require the client to secure its data before delivering it to an outsourcing partner.

"This makes sense until you realize that the entire goal of the outsourcing arrangement is to move as much work as possible to lower cost resources," says Mike Logan, president of Axis Technology, an IT consulting firm.

He adds that outsourcing customers can find themselves in a Catch-22 situation where they can't realize the cost savings from offshoring because they have to invest extra money in data security. And unfortunately, he says, there's no easy solution to the conundrum.

Exercise Discipline

The best safeguard against all these pitfalls is to take your time. "Companies that are successful at outsourcing will often dedicate years before a contract is even signed," says Robinson & Cole's Green. "They do financial modeling, risk identification and mitigation planning, technical, financial and reputational due diligence on potential suppliers, and head-to-head contract negotiation to force suppliers to cough up the best terms."

Source: http://news.idg.no/cw/art.cfm?id=3B98AA64-1A64-67EA-E440A83D4FD905A0

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

HP moves OpenVMS dev to India

The companies that create and modernize operating systems are under the same economic pressures as the IT departments of corporations - large and small - that create and maintain their own applications atop those operating systems. And it comes as no surprise that the development of the venerable OpenVMS proprietary operating system - under the control of Hewlett-Packard since its 2001 acquisition of Compaq - is moving largely to India.

The news of the changes in the OpenVMS development organization came to light when Ann McQuaid, general manager of the OpenVMS platform, sent out a letter to AlphaServer and Integrity shops that have applications running on OpenVMS. In that letter, which you can read on the OpenVMS newsgroups hosted by Google here, McQuaid said that Sue Skonetski, manager of engineering programs for the OpenVMS software engineering group, will be "pursuing new opportunities" after 15 years as the main advocate of the OpenVMS platform inside Digital Equipment, Compaq, and then HP over those years.

McQuaid added that Sujatha Ramani will take over the Skonetski's responsibilities, including what HP called technical customer programs and communications. Ramani has spent 11 years at HP in its PC, printing, and corporate IT businesses in various sales, marketing, operations, and channel and account management jobs. But as you might imagine, that's not the same thing as being the OpenVMS standard bearer advocating for the platform inside the HP corporate behemoth.

On the OpenVMS newsgroup, there were rumors flying around that not only was Skonetski leaving HP, but that OpenVMS development and maintenance was being shifted to the software development lab in Bangalore, India. According to those rumors, all but about a dozen HP employees are being let go from the OpenVMS labs in Marlboro, Massachusetts, and those employees will interface between the Indian development team and HP's corporate offices and, presumably, OpenVMS customers.

An HP spokesperson said that OpenVMS has been developed in facilities around the globe, including the Marlboro and Bangalore labs, for years. Digital did a lot of OpenVMS work in Nashua, New Hampshire, but that facility was shuttered in December 2007.

HP, as you might imagine, doesn't want OpenVMS customers freaking out over the loss of Skonetski and the move of the development efforts to a new team. "HP continues to be fully committed to the OpenVMS operating system and its future development," explained Brian Cox, director of software planning and marketing for Business Critical Systems in an email exchange. "The mix of HP resources is adjusted from time to time as we utilize engineering resources from around the world. This provides the highest level of support for our customers with the optimal business model for HP."

Cox did not provide any details on layoffs in the Marlboro lab or where the OpenVMS development lab would be located, if indeed it is in India as the rumors suggest.

OpenVMS and its predecessors for VAXen and their kickers are coming up on 31 years in commercial and technical computing, and like all proprietary systems, they're under great pressure from the large Windows installed base and cast Windows ecosystem of applications. Just like HP's MPE/ix platform, which will be supported until December 31, 2010, and IBM's OS/400, which has been renamed "i" (and is i 6.1 in its latest release) and which runs on its latest Power Systems iron.

HP ported OpenVMS to its Itanium-based Integrity servers - a process that took a lot longer than many customers had hoped, especially since Compaq was working on a port of its OpenVMS, Tru64 Unix, and NonStop platforms before HP came a-wooing in September 2001 - and finally delivered OpenVMS v8.2 on selected models in January 2005. In September 2006, OpenVMS v8.3 was launched at the same time as Integrity machines using HP's "Arches" chipset and the dual-core "Montecito" Itanium 9000 processors. The current OpenVMS, v8.3-1H1, was tweaked to support the dual-core "Montvale" Itanium 9100 processors and added support for the BL860c and BL870c Itanium blade servers so OpenVMS shops could move to blades instead of rx Series rack servers.

If you look at the most current OpenVMS roadmap, OpenVMS v8.4 is in development now and will make use of new Integrity servers (presumably those based on the quad-core "Tukwila" Itaniums, which are way late to market) and will include improvements for virtualization and disaster tolerance clusters (including the support for VMSclusters over TCP/IP). OpenVMS v8.4 will run inside HP's own Itanium-based hypervisor, IntegrityVM, as a guest operating system, much as Windows, Linux, and HP-UX already do.

With Tukwila pushed out, OpenVMS development has been pushed out too, and in this case, OpenVMS v8.4 is now being promised for the first half of 2010, somewhere between 6 and 12 months after the Tukwilas take the field at HP. And beyond that, OpenVMS v.next is on the roadmap for the "next wave of enterprise computing." That probably means "Poulson" and "Kittson" Itanium support - and maybe not much else if you are cynical about IT suppliers putting proprietary operating systems into maintenance mode. As many OpenVMS shops will be, by the way. If this isn't the case, now would be a good time for HP to start talking a little bit more for its plans for OpenVMS.

It will be interesting to see where HP-UX and NonStop development end up.

Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/12/openvms_to_india/

Monday, May 11, 2009

NASA Makes Space for Open Source Software

Space Shuttle Atlantis launched today on its way to the final Hubble telescope repair mission. There's an old joke originally quipped by astronaut Wally Schirra that NASA spacecraft really is a modern marvel, especially when you consider it's built by the lowest bidders. It's the government's tight purse strings, however, that has helped open source software put its fingerprints all over the space agency.

NASA says it has four main reasons for promoting the use and development of open source software:

  • To increase NASA software quality via community peer review
  • To accelerate software development via community contributions
  • To maximize the awareness and impact of NASA research
  • To increase dissemination of NASA software in support of NASA's education mission

NASA's CosmosCode program, launched in 2007, brings open source developers together to create space exploration software. It also opens the door for individual coders to get involved in the space industry and a offers a way for space companies to partner with NASA to develop mutually beneficial software. The CosmoCode project is currently open for internal alpha testing and looking for volunteers.

To aid in software development, NASA created CoLab, a blend of virtual and physical coworking environments. Since community members are spread out all over the globe, a lot of collaboration activity takes place on a private island in Second Life, a virtual world built around an open source framework. NASA even has its own OSI-approved software license, the NASA Open Source Agreement, to apply to software created for the agency.

NASA's Ames Research Center recently developed a bug tracker written with open source Bugzilla tools. The Problem Reporting Analysis and Corrective Action (PRACA) system provides a single trouble ticket database that's available to everyone involved in the Shuttle program, clearly a better solution than the 40 different databases it has amassed over the last 30 years.

Open source software played a critical role in the Mars Rover program, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux turns up all over NASA, from the computers streaming spacecraft video to the server managing its mission countdown clock.In fact, Red Hat Community Engineer Jack Aboutboul got a behind the scenes look at just how prevalent open source is at NASA. Space junkies beware, the photos will make you green with envy.

Source: http://ostatic.com/blog/nasa-makes-space-for-open-source-software

Knowledge Haus Selects Neubloc for Expert Software Development

Knowledge Haus has teamed with Neubloc, a US-based global software product development services and consultancy provider, to help launch their StoryDeck application by mid-year 2009. The partnership makes it possible for Knowledge Haus to bring their product to market faster, which translates to increased revenue and market share opportunities. Neubloc's "follow the sun" 24/7 schedule strategy provides expert software product developer teams located around the globe to shorten development cycles and reduce costs for Knowledge Haus.

The StoryDeck application from Knowledge Haus, an online community startup based in California, enables users to create, edit, and publish collaborative videos categorically over the web. Teaming with Neubloc creates a relationship with shared interests along with essential capital and expert development resources to get an innovative, quality product to market.

Neubloc is the only software developer solutions provider that is offering a unique equity option program aimed to provide early-stage companies access to low-cost capital and software development resources. The investment program lowers cash burn by 50 to 70%, alleviating economic pressures and providing a foundation for sustainability and growth.

Neubloc's Equity Option Program provides access to financing for angel and early-stage enterprise, while also retaining Neubloc's expertise in software design and product development. By offering critical onshore and offshore software development services for cash and equity payments, Neubloc is a vendor of choice for business owners because of the dual benefits of significantly reducing costs and lowering requirements for immediate cash expenditures.

"StoryDeck has a lot of moving parts and the development of the site required a clear user design and strict project management of the development effort and the fact that Neubloc is an equity partner going forward gives me complete faith in the deal," says Rebecca Bohms, Managing Director of Knowledge Haus. "Neubloc came highly recommended as the best partner for providing complete back office new product development, capable of handling the complexity of the project and to deliver it on time and on budget and they have delivered every step of the way."

"It's a win-win for both Knowledge Haus and Neubloc. Economically, now is to the best time to invest in early and growth stage companies and our program provides an extension of expert software development services tethered to critical capital resources necessary for start-ups and entrepreneurs to succeed," said Armando Viteri, president and CEO for Neubloc.

Source: http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=207962&Itemid=33

Thursday, May 7, 2009

Study: US companies eye home soil for outsourcing

A recent study by BDO Seidman LLP, an accounting and consulting organization, finds that nearly a quarter of the chief financial officers at US technology businesses who outsource plan to consider the United States as the main outsourcing destination in 2009.

Twenty-two percent of the chief financial officers surveyed pegged the United States as an outsourcing destination; 16 percent named China and 13 percent named India. These were the three top countries named in the survey.

China takes the number two position with 16 percent, followed by India with 13 percent. Nineteen percent say they have no plans for further outsourcing, according to the study

“While last year may have produced an outsourcing bubble, 2009 will see companies retrench to survive in the face of reduced demand. The United States has become a far more viable option for them,” said Douglas Sirotta, a partner in BDO Seidman’s technology practice.

“This year we are seeing three global factors that are causing US technology companies to pull back from traditional outsourcing locations, led by the recent boom and bust of the worldwide economy. Satyam’s fraud case and the terrorist attacks in Mumbai are causing a lot of companies to reconsider operating in India. And supply chain and shipping cost issues in China are negatively impacting the attractiveness of outsourcing technology operations to the Far East,” Sirotta added.

Higher shipping costs from China to the United States may also weigh into decisions about whether the United States is seen as an attractive alternative to farming out operations to China.

The cost of shipping a 40-foot, standard container from East Asia to the eastern seaboard of the United States has tripled since 2000, according to a late 2008 report from CIBC World Markets in Toronto.

Other findings from the study include:

  • The most common non-US locations for outsourcing are India, at 50 percent; Southeast Asia, including the Philippines, at 31 percent, down from 50 percent in 2008; China, at 19 percent, down from 46 percent in 2008, and Western Europe, at 19 percent.

  • Economic climate affects international growth plans. Less than half, 42 percent, of the CFOs surveyed indicate that they have operations outside the United States, compared to nearly double that amount, 79 percent last year. Nearly a third, 29 percent of respondents, said their primary concern regarding international growth is an uncertain business or political climate. Twenty-six percent cite international business and tax regulations, with 21 percent citing currency risk, 14 percent intellectual property risk and exploitation, and 10 percent training of international employees as their primary concern.

  • Of those outsourcing, the most common functions being off-shored currently are: manufacturing, at 54 percent; information technology services and programming, at 46 percent; and research and development, distribution and call centers, all at 35 percent.

Source: http://www.indusbusinessjournal.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=884EBE4DDA734BD5BDFAA9E8C533BCDA

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

China to Fund Software-Information Service Projects

US President Barack Obama's announcement to end tax sops to those US firms outsourcing jobs to countries like India has come under lak from Phil Harkins, a leading US management expert and chief executive of Linkage Inc, a global firm specializing in leadership development.

"What Obama is doing is just politics. It's the arrogance of the US to think creating jobs overseas will result in job losses back home. Such measures (offering tax sops) will not stop US firms from outsourcing talent where it's available at a best cost," Harkins told IANS Tuesday on the margins of a news conference here.

Terming Obama's observations on outsourcing as political posturing, Harkins said in a globalised world, companies look for sharing resources, be they human or investments, to remain competitive and sustain growth even in a downturn.

"I don't think American firms will stop outsourcing jobs overseas for availing tax incentives at home in a global economy. By outsourcing jobs where they are beneficial and cost-effective, they actually protect jobs back home and stay competitive," he said.

Clarifying that Obama's proposal had to do more with the international tax policy reform than creating jobs in the US, Harkins said those US firms with global operations outsource jobs where they make business sense.

"By outsourcing manufacturing of goods to countries like China, the US economy benefitted a lot. Similarly, by outsourcing services or back-office operations to overseas firms located in countries like India, US firms benefit a lot more," Harkins said at the launch of his firm's India operations here.

The Massachusetts-based Linkage offers corporate clients the world over with integrated solutions, including strategic consulting services, customized leadership development and training experiences, tailored assessment services, executive coaching and benchmark research.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Obama-stand-on-outsourcing-is-politics-US-expert-/articleshow/4487816.cms

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Obama stand on outsourcing is politics, says US expert

US President Barack Obama's announcement to end tax sops to those US firms outsourcing jobs to countries like India has come under lak from Phil Harkins, a leading US management expert and chief executive of Linkage Inc, a global firm specializing in leadership development.

"What Obama is doing is just politics. It's the arrogance of the US to think creating jobs overseas will result in job losses back home. Such measures (offering tax sops) will not stop US firms from outsourcing talent where it's available at a best cost," Harkins told IANS Tuesday on the margins of a news conference here.

Terming Obama's observations on outsourcing as political posturing, Harkins said in a globalised world, companies look for sharing resources, be they human or investments, to remain competitive and sustain growth even in a downturn.

"I don't think American firms will stop outsourcing jobs overseas for availing tax incentives at home in a global economy. By outsourcing jobs where they are beneficial and cost-effective, they actually protect jobs back home and stay competitive," he said.

Clarifying that Obama's proposal had to do more with the international tax policy reform than creating jobs in the US, Harkins said those US firms with global operations outsource jobs where they make business sense.

"By outsourcing manufacturing of goods to countries like China, the US economy benefitted a lot. Similarly, by outsourcing services or back-office operations to overseas firms located in countries like India, US firms benefit a lot more," Harkins said at the launch of his firm's India operations here.

The Massachusetts-based Linkage offers corporate clients the world over with integrated solutions, including strategic consulting services, customized leadership development and training experiences, tailored assessment services, executive coaching and benchmark research.

Source: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Obama-stand-on-outsourcing-is-politics-US-expert-/articleshow/4487816.cms